May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a wonderful alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it normally as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s great for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public health today is obesity and diet. For that reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into the mouth area, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to Juul Compatible Pods smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.
Along with the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes that you can buy could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn implies that fewer people will purchase them.